Wang finds that the 200 million counted as contributions for the Vanke too much?.

Contributions from the day the earthquake 200 million years, Vanke plunged into the shelling of users across the country. .And Wang himself, is the abuse by some users. .As the leading real estate company, Vanke has been focusing on corporate image, focus on brand building. .Today, this well-intentioned donors, but rather makes a good image of their long-term business greatly reduced. .Nature is good to see the donation itself, worthy of the repertoire. .The reason was the shelling of Vanke, the number of naturally derived from their contributions. .Overall corporate donations from the national point of view, companies with more than 10 million donations a few of these companies are quite reputable big business, and in the users the impression that Vanke also supposed to belong to the ranks. .As a result, users have led to dissatisfaction. .Now, take a look at this site survey on the matter: contributions from 200 million users do not buy group data, Vanke 200 million, more than half of those surveyed believe that too little, reaching 53%. .This half of the users is actually quite polite, and another 34% of those surveyed believe that their is too stingy directly. .In addition, 10% believed that donations dedicated like, only less than 2% of people think that the number of contributions is appropriate. .From this survey data, Vanke's 200 million apparently did not get the majority of people. .So how does the number of more appropriate? .Contributions to 10 million users parties agree that from the data, most people think of Vanke should contribute more than 10 million, reaching 76%. .16% of those surveyed believe that China Vanke contributions to between 5 million to 10 million. .Another 5% of people think that should be between 2 million to 5 million. .Finally, there are still less than 2% of people think that 200 million less on it. .Thus, most users believe that more than 10 million contribution is consistent with Vanke's corporate image. .When Vanke national crisis such as the first in the severely affected among the bearers of protecting national burden, is also the focus of attention by people. .Therefore, we have done the survey, that is, for large companies like Vanke, should be the main disaster relief. .This data can be seen, the majority of respondents believe that large companies such Vanke disaster relief should be the main force, reached 81%. .Can see that the occasion of the national crisis, large companies such as Vanke, or carrying the expectations of people more. .In the eyes of people, so that large enterprises tend to have ample financial resources, they should be able to make the disaster in more contributions. .Bowen Yin Zhengyi charitable burden? .In addition, there are hugely controversial interpretation of Wang in his blog. .In his blog, Wang believes that "China is a disaster-prone countries, disaster relief charity event is a normal, corporate donations should be sustainable, rather than a burden." From the survey data, 72% of those surveyed believe that Wang .This argument is inappropriate, only a small number of people identify with this statement Wang. .Can be seen in the Bowen Wang's view led to many for his criticism. .I believe that, although Wang's point of view has its own unique, but the "burden" one that is quite wrong, actually hurt the people's heart. .The so-called difficult countries, every man's duty, as if everyone of its burden, aloof, the country will certainly not country. .In short, the contributions Vanke, and Wang Bo-wen, all of their corporate image had a huge negative impact. .In fact, I do not agree to contributions to Heroes. .Comparisons of the number of contributions, but not a good thing. .Regardless of the amount of donation, as long as do what we can contribute for the country would be sufficient to make people happy. .However, as people carrying the expectations of the business, but this is the burden, even if the donated money, how can win popular support? .</ P>.